US scraps order linking arms sales to international law

Not a valid attachment ID.
On February 21, 2025, the Trump administration rescinded National Security Memorandum-20 (NSM-20), a directive established during President Joe Biden's tenure that linked U.S. arms sales to the human rights records of recipient nations. NSM-20, signed in February 2024, mandated comprehensive assessments of how U.S.-supplied weapons were utilized by allies, with a particular focus on adherence to international humanitarian law. This policy emerged amid concerns over the use of American-made munitions in conflict zones, notably by Israel in Gaza.

The repeal of NSM-20 has elicited significant debate within political and international circles. Proponents argue that the original memorandum imposed undue constraints on U.S. defense partnerships and that its removal is essential for maintaining strategic alliances and supporting allies effectively. Critics, however, contend that this action undermines global human rights efforts and diminishes the United States' moral authority on the international stage. Senator Chris Van Hollen described the decision as "shameful," asserting that it compromises national security and global human rights.

This policy shift is part of a broader realignment of U.S. foreign aid and military support under the current administration. In January 2025, Secretary of State Marco Rubio ordered a suspension of nearly all foreign aid, excluding military assistance to longstanding allies such as Israel and Egypt. This suspension affects a wide range of development and military aid programs, with potential implications for countries that have traditionally relied on U.S. support.

Additionally, in August 2024, the administration lifted a three-year ban on offensive weapons sales to Saudi Arabia. This decision was influenced by a United Nations-led truce in Yemen, which had significantly reduced hostilities. The resumption of arms sales to Saudi Arabia reflects a strategic recalibration of U.S. relations in the Middle East, aiming to strengthen alliances amidst regional instability.

Collectively, these actions indicate a strategic shift in U.S. foreign policy, prioritizing traditional alliances and geopolitical interests, potentially at the expense of previous commitments to human rights considerations in arms sales and foreign aid distribution.

[attachment deleted by admin]