Mandelson Should Never Have Been Ambassador," Says Epstein Victim's Family

In a powerful and deeply personal statement, the family of an Epstein victim has publicly condemned the appointment of Peter Mandelson as an ambassador, asserting that his past connections and actions make him unfit for such a role. The family's emotional and detailed account, spanning a six-page document, goes beyond a simple accusation, weaving a narrative of betrayal, injustice, and a fundamental failure of accountability at the highest levels. Their statement paints a picture of a political establishment that, in their view, prioritized influence and power over the safety and well-being of vulnerable individuals.
The family's grievances are not rooted in a single event, but in a series of interactions and alleged complicities they say occurred over many years. They speak of a culture of silence and enablement that surrounded Jeffrey Epstein and his associates, a network that they believe Mandelson was a part of, whether directly or indirectly. The document meticulously details the family's journey, from the initial shock of their loved one's abuse to their frustrating and often fruitless attempts to seek justice. They describe a system that seemed designed to protect the powerful, leaving victims and their families feeling marginalized and unheard. The family's statement serves as a devastating critique of the political elite, arguing that their relationships and allegiances created a shield that allowed Epstein's horrific crimes to continue for far too long.
Central to their argument is the belief that Mandelson's past associations with Epstein should have been a disqualifying factor for any public office, let alone a diplomatic one. They contend that his appointment sends a message that such connections are not only acceptable but can be overlooked in the pursuit of political expediency. The family expresses a profound sense of disillusionment, feeling that the very institutions meant to uphold justice and protect citizens are instead rewarding those they believe were complicit in or at least turned a blind eye to heinous acts. They speak of a system where a person's character and moral compass seem to matter less than their political connections, a reality that, for them, is a painful and constant reminder of their loss.
The document is an emotional plea for greater scrutiny and transparency in political appointments. The family does not just want to see Mandelson's appointment revoked; they seek a broader reevaluation of how individuals are vetted for positions of power. They call for a system that values integrity and a genuine commitment to public service above all else. Their account is a testament to the long-lasting trauma inflicted by Epstein's crimes, a trauma that is compounded, they argue, by the perception that those who were close to him are now being celebrated and rewarded. The family's statement is a raw and unvarnished look at the intersection of power, privilege, and abuse, and a powerful demand for a reckoning that they believe is long overdue.
Source@BBC