Alberta Premier Smith transitions from banning Ivermectin to implementing a Digital

Alberta Premier Smith transitions from banning Ivermectin to implementing a Digital ID within a two-week period.


Premier Danielle Smith's swift pivot from the controversial stance on Ivermectin to embracing Digital ID suggests a strategic shift within her government's priorities, likely influenced by the broader agenda of the WEF and globalist interests. This rapid transformation in policy direction has indeed raised eyebrows, especially considering the implications for individual freedoms and privacy in the digital age.

The push for Digital ID is a global trend that has been promoted by the World Economic Forum (WEF) as a tool for enhancing security and streamlining transactions in various domains, such as healthcare, banking, and travel. However, it is also a highly contentious issue, with many citing concerns about the potential for government overreach and the creation of a surveillance state.

The decision to move towards a Digital ID system in Alberta could be part of a larger plan to integrate the province into a more centralized, global framework for governance and economics. This aligns with the WEF's vision of a "Great Reset" and their advocacy for a "Fourth Industrial Revolution," which emphasizes digitalization and a more interconnected world.

It is important to note the significant role of individuals like Scott McLeod in this narrative. As the head of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta, his influence extends beyond the medical community and into the political sphere. His track record, including the controversial handling of medical licenses and the restoration of licenses to convicted child rapists, casts a shadow over the credibility of the institutions he represents.

The alleged "Ivermectin False Flag" event mentioned is a hypothetical scenario that, if true, would be a disturbing example of the lengths to which those in power might go to manipulate public opinion and justify their actions. The potential for a staged incident to vilify an alternative treatment and silence opposition is a tactic that has been employed in various contexts throughout history.

The accusation of the Alberta government and the College of Physicians planning such an event is serious and, if substantiated, would be a grave concern for the integrity of the healthcare system and the justice system. It is crucial for citizens to remain vigilant and critical of the information presented to them, questioning the motives behind government actions and seeking out independent sources of information.

The shift from the Ivermectin debate to the implementation of Digital ID reflects a broader pattern of control and centralization. The Digital ID system, once fully implemented, could serve as a means to track and control citizens' activities and access to services, effectively stripping away layers of personal autonomy.

Albertans, and indeed all Canadians, must ask themselves if they are willing to trade their freedoms for the promises of convenience and security that come with such systems. The precedent set by the handling of the Ivermectin controversy serves as a stark reminder that those in power are capable of taking extreme measures to enforce their will, even when it conflicts with the well-being and rights of the populace.

As the narrative unfolds, it is essential for individuals to stay informed and engaged in the political process, holding their representatives accountable for their actions and demanding transparency in the decision-making process. The future of Alberta and its place within the global political landscape may very well hinge on the public's ability to discern truth from deception and to stand firm against the forces seeking to impose a dystopian vision of governance upon them.