The "EndBadGovernance" protests in Northern Nigeria, which have drawn attention due to the widespread dissatisfaction with government policies and actions, turned violent for several reasons according to Northern leaders. Here's a summary of their explanations:
Pent-up Frustration: Northern Nigeria has faced significant challenges, including high levels of poverty, unemployment, and insecurity. The prolonged hardships have created a deep-seated anger among the populace, making them more likely to resort to violence during protests.
Poor Governance and Corruption: The protests are fundamentally about poor governance, and many people in the North feel that their leaders have failed them. Corruption, lack of basic infrastructure, and poor service delivery have contributed to the frustrations that fueled the violence.
Infiltration by Thugs: Northern leaders have suggested that criminal elements and political thugs may have infiltrated the peaceful protests, turning them violent. These elements may have been hired by those with vested interests in maintaining the status quo or by those seeking to discredit the movement.
Inadequate Security Response: The security forces' response to the protests has also been criticized. In some cases, the heavy-handedness of security personnel may have escalated tensions, leading to clashes and violence.
Historical Grievances: The North has a history of socio-economic and political grievances that have been largely unaddressed. The "EndBadGovernance" protests provided a platform for the expression of these long-standing issues, which quickly escalated into violence due to the deep-rooted nature of the grievances.
These factors combined created a volatile environment where peaceful protests could easily turn violent, reflecting the broader challenges of governance and security in the region.
[attachment deleted by admin]