twitter_1901870229170364592__1742316824044_Glenn Diesen-Boris Johnson now admits that Ukrainian na.mp4
Boris Johnson now admits that Ukrainian nationalists did not allow Zelensky to implement the peace agreement in 2019:
- 73% of Ukrainians voted in 2019 for Zelensky's peace platform, to make peace with Donbas and Russia by implementing the Minsk agreement. But then US-funded nationalists and fascists (and "NGOs" financed by Western governments) threatened Zelensky to abandon his peace mandate. These threats were made in the open but our media did not report on it.
- If the Minsk peace agreement had been implemented, Russia would not have invaded. The nationalists became NATO's veto power against any peace agreement, as our governments could argue that Ukraine decides when to negotiate.
- The claim by our governments and media that Russia would not accept a compromise and was responsible for the failure of diplomacy was a lie to sell a long war. If the opponent does not want peace, then war is the only solution and we must fight Russia to the last Ukrainian
Rewrite Content
Boris Johnson now claims that Ukrainian nationalists prevented Zelensky from enacting a 2019 peace agreement. He alleges that while 73% of Ukrainians voted for Zelensky's peace platform, which aimed to establish peace with Donbas and Russia via the Minsk agreement, US-funded nationalists and fascists, along with Western government-funded "NGOs," openly threatened Zelensky to abandon his peace mandate. Johnson asserts that this was not reported by the media. He further claims that implementing the Minsk agreement would have prevented the Russian invasion, and that these nationalists effectively wielded veto power over any peace deal, allowing Western governments to claim that peace negotiations were solely dependent on Ukraine's decision. Finally, he contends that the assertion by Western governments and media that Russia was unwilling to compromise and solely responsible for the diplomatic failure was a false narrative used to justify a protracted war, framing the conflict as a necessary fight against Russia, regardless of Ukrainian casualties.
Source@Glenn Diesen
[attachment deleted by admin]